The Unconventional GasConference last week in Vienna provided solutions to the issues the conventional wisdom at the European Gas Conference were seeing as problems.  Too bad they didn't cross the hall that often, here's some of what they missed.

Mark Sundland of Anadarko, a company which only entered shale in 2009, provided an update on what is happening now in the US.  This is what gas could look like, with many of the problems having solutions.  One eye opening statistic was that they were now drilling wells in less than six days. Mark and other speakers highlighted how US shale is far more abundant, affordable and efficient than the models some investors use to determine shale profitability. Too much of European thinking is based on what happened in the US in the past as model. Europe has the advantage of backwardness.  We’ll have faster drills, with faster drill bits, using less power, less water, less chemicals and less money.  

Mark, like other Americans present were bemused over how slow European regulation was happening.  Bill Marble of Poland’s Wisent is a US shale pioneer who provided much of the expertise to Chesapeake when he sold Hallwood to them ten years ago. He, like others, is frustrated at how the simplest decisions in Poland are taking months instead of days. Poland, as I noted last month is rapidly losing it’s advantage of first mover.  It can easily regain this, but it needs leadership at the national scale translated into local action.

One of the most interesting presentations was from Serge Catoire of the French Ministry of Economy. M. Catoire said that France was very interested in developments in the UK and Poland and success there could “unfreeze” the French shale debate. “For now, the situation is frozen in France. We will look elsewhere. We hope that what is frozen might melt”.

This puts even more pressure on Cuadrilla, although they seem equal to the task. The shale gas ball is now in the UK’s court. It is not an understatement to say that every country in Europe is depending on Cuadrilla to show them the money and not to mess it up.  One can't underestimate just how much is riding on this. That makes it all the more surprising that a large part of the international economy is at risk of decisions by a council planning committee frozen in the headlights by nimbys and a few cement obsessed blowhards. This is big picture stuff that runs the risk of being dragged down by pygmies.

The common theme from speakers and delegates from Germany, Poland, Denmark, the UK and Spain was that something had to be done about public acceptance. But we’ve had that discussion for what seems like, and sadly, actually is, years, and somewhat like Mark Twain said about the weather, everybody complains about it, but nobody does anything about it.  I for one am getting bored with that and I’m actively trying to do something more than this blog if anyone wants to get in touch.

The next day there were developments in France that would have been unthinkable last year. I can’t find much in English on the subject, but essentially the Parliamentary committee on Science evaluation unanimously voted to open a new study on shale gas.  This was followed by statements from Serge Catoire's boss Arnaud Montebourg who finally seems to be understanding that shale gas in France is a mere side show to shale oil.

That immediately bought protests from the Green partners in the coalition who said that shale was a red line that couldn’t be crossed.  My view is that perhaps the government, who need not depend on the Greens for a majority and despite their other troubles are still faced with fractured right wing opponents (more likely to support shale anyway), wouldn’t be especially bothered to see them go.  

That would have political implications in the UK, where a right wing government in coalition  with lukewarm Lib Dem support for shale gas, wouldn’t be too concerned if that came to pass in the UK.  The UK Lib Dems are confused (I voted for them for example!), but not suicidal.  The EELV Greens in France labour under the delusion UK greens share, of thinking they have far more support than they really have.  

UK Greens live in an echo chamber where they all agree with one another and point blank refuse to engage with pragmatists.  From that perspective they actually think that green policies are vote winners and the world today is the same as ten years ago. UK greens could take down the rest of their policies with them, causing untold damage to progressive politics as fallout from their bitter ender approach to all or nothing green policies. But the UK green establishment is becoming separated from some of their base, even if it is currently a small minority. Greens have particularly poisonous discussions within themselves and I’m not going to embarrass anyone. Yet. But as with the US Tea Party post-Obama, whether they choose to face new realities or not, history will not absolve them but simply go on regardless. 

Finally, the interesting chatter at conferences is always offside. Conventional and Unconventional people alike risk missing that the rest of the world is becoming increasingly aware of shale.  By that I don’t only mean the Asian investors who are getting more interested in Europe, nor the  US mid caps who see potential in Europe as well, nor the well-informed and horrified OPEC countries present.

Shale gas and oil implications are too important to be left to policy makers in environment ministries. When the political and military think tanks start sniffing around as much as they were in Vienna, expect shale to start being discussed at the top table by all the cabinets of Europe. The recent Algerian events for example were much discussed in the context of a realignment of risk perceptions. Shale gas in Europe may seem financially risk but no one is coming home in a coffin as a Japanese pointed out to me. 

This past weekend, some of the same security policy wonks were at a European security conference in Munich where the heavy energy hitters were talking big picture.  

The shale gas and oil boom is already underway. As Europe continues to debate it, North America is reaping the advantages," said Jorma Ollila, Chairman of Royal Dutch Shell .

"Observing this from across the Atlantic it is really quite remarkable that there should be a ban or a go-slow on this development in Europe, really without any facts," said Daniel Yergin, Vice-Chairman of IHS Cambridge Energy Research.

Climate policy is interesting, energy is important, money is key but military power is where the rubber really hits the road. That is why Europe,  eventually, inevitably will embrace shale.  Nudging it politely along is OK, but this could be the start of some actual kicking.

Overall Rating (0)

0 out of 5 stars

Leave your comments

Post comment as a guest

0 / 3000 Character restriction
Your text should be less than 3000 characters

People in this conversation

  • Good that bit about Europe being backward in this. This country has often suffered from being first but now it's the Americans. About the green support people were happy to do it when it was cost free but now it isn't they will have 2nd thoughts.

    0 Like
  • Andy

    Have you gotten a copy of the leaked BND report on shale that has caused such a stir in Europe? The best stories that I have seen have no more than half a dozen quotes from the report, and don't mention it's official title.

    0 Like
  • Andy

    The headline of The Times "Britain has shale gas for 1500 years, but bills won't be lower".<br /><br />I've heard that the Brits have a reputation for finding the cloud behind every silver lining but Jeeez!<br /><br />If I' wrote the headline I could think of better options,<br /><br />Britain has shale gas for 1500 years, Party!<br />Britain has shale gas for 1500 years, and bills will be lower<br />Britain has shale gas for 1500 years, and Davey doesn't want to win the next election<br />Britain has shale gas for 1500 years, and some people can't stand prosperity<br /><br />You get the idea.

    0 Like
  • DP

    In reply to: Andy

    The trouble is that with the carbon taxes being planned they could produce it for next to nothing and bills won't be any lower.

    0 Like
  • Sometimes I despair about this country I really do and The Times pieces is one of them. I would say that the people of England are different from their journalists, otherwise the entire country would have slit their wrists years ago having lost the will to go on after such unrelenting pessimism.<br /><br />I think the pessimism today reflects the state of the newspaper industry. They are all going broke, losing readership to the free papers and the internet. Very few people, except for journalists themselves, really pay much attention to them, apart unfortunately , from politicians.

    0 Like
  • The very good news for UK plc is that if the gas is there in such volumes and can be recovered then the view of politicians is irrelevant. They can delay production for a few years but there is an inevitability that we will move our economy to natural gas. By 2030 we can have no imports of oil or gas. <br /><br />With the UK economy in a bad way and politicians eager to spend billions on renewable energy and nuclear subsidies, the penny will drop soon enough. Importing LNG from Qatar and oil from Saudi Arabia are not sustainable options for a country deeply in debt with no obvious way out.....apart from shale gas.<br /><br />CCS has effectively been dropped, lets hope that nuclear is dropped as well, we will then be in good shape.

    0 Like